H. L. Haywood once wrote, Not more men in Masonry, but more Masonry in men.
This has been a topic of discussion between myself and a few Brothers. I once has a prominent Mason in our area tell me that because he felt cheated by the Blue Lightning experience he went through, it caused him to seek more light in Masonry on his own. He is unique, as too often, we discussed, the rest of the men get their secret decoder rings and just say "Cool, I'm a Mason!" and off they go.
One of the items brought up by our discussions was the concept of quantity over quality. We rush guys in, get them degrees as soon as possible so that they don't lose interest, don't focus on education at all between the degrees and rush the experience. In my case, by the time I was a fellowcraft, I was quite confused. What word? huh? grip? when do I use that? There was no place for me to go to learn and no one offered to help. Id occasionally get a short paper given to me to read or a regional publication to go through.
I understand the need for members, it is for the financial well being of the Blue Lodge. We need members, to pay fees and dues so that the lodge can survive. Each year we lose members due to indifference, death, lack of time, whatever and we need to replace them. But should we do this at the sacrifice of who we are and what we are all about?
We have been fortunate to have some new members and Entered Apprentices who appreciate the education and have been participating in events. Still, the discussion led to the possibility that some men may not get involved because they truly do not have Masonry in their hearts. Long ago, it took long periods of time to advance from Apprentice to Fellowcraft and then to be raised a Master Mason. Why? It was to see who was dedicated to the craft, to weed out those who truly didn't have it in themselves to be a true part of the organization. What did I say earlier? We move guys through so that they don't lose interest. Perhaps they lose interest if they truly don't have the craft in their heart? Some may some may not, we should never say all or never, but it is a possibility.
Could it be that some men dont get too involved because when they were raised, Masonic Education was not a focus or a factor in the process? They didn't exactly know what they were getting into or what was expected of them? I revert back to the 24 inch rule. This particular symbol always sticks out to me as one thing I learned well, equally dividing our time between work, rest and craft. Sometimes I devote a little more to one than the other, but in the long run it all evens out. I am devoted to my craft and my devotion is trying to instill that devotion into others. To be true to H. L. Haywood's quote and put more Masonry into men.

Many thanks, Bro. Bill. I hope my request didn't offend.
ReplyDeleteBest of luck with the Evanston Masonic Research Society. You may find some value in The Masonic Society, which could be a valuable resource for you and EMRS.
http://themasonicsociety.com/
C&F,
Jay
Thanks! I have been in contact with them. They have been very helpful!
ReplyDeleteIn my experience the blue lightning is hurting our institution. We are getting a lot of guys that may or may not truly be worthy of being called a Mason. As a result their poor behavior in public demeans the value of what Masonry is. It only takes one bad apple to spoil the bunch. Masonry already has a mixed reputation in our society. Do we really need to perpetuate a bad view of the craft because we are so anxious for new members?
ReplyDeleteFurther I would question the motives behind the blue lightning initiative. Rushing someone through what should be a once in a lifetime experience robs the candidate of the value of the degree presentation. Further it makes the entire organization appear as a joke; hey these guys will let anyone in.
Just look at the results of our last grand lodge. Precious few attended, and then we discover that there were members that had been kicked out of the fraternity for various felony crimes. Many were drug related but one was convicted of child pornography. So now we have some guy who while no longer a member, is still in possession of our secrets and can continue to say to anyone who will listen hey yeah I am a Mason. Who knows what he will do with the information. While I know that if one searches hard enough they can find a great deal on the internet, the issue is that society will judge us based on the few and not the many.
Are we really in such a hurry to rush a process that traditionally took years simply because we are afraid that the man may lose interest? If he loses interest then maybe he was not worthy of Masonry in the first place.
Further, the watering down of Masonic initiation I feel hurts us in other ways. We not only end up with men that do not have the prerequisite moral fortitude to be worthy of the name, but their immaturity, pessimism, and general sloth can have a tendency to have an adverse effect on the lodge they belong to.
I belong to two lodges and I am very active in both. In fact I am WM master of one, but this is only due to my hard work and dedication. As master I have tried along with Brother Bill to start a number of community projects and events. What we end up with is a bunch of guys that say yeah cool I will be there and then they never show. One such event we specifically asked how many will be there so that we could ensure enough food for everyone. Many said they would show but when the event took place we had eight people and food for 20-30.
I should not have to ask a brother do I have your word as a Mason. As a man worthy of being called a Mason his word should already be his bond. It seems that we have to "shame" these brothers into showing up by saying hey do I have your word as a Mason? Even that is not enough as many that have given their word fail to show.
As a result of these experiences I find it difficult to want to continue let alone hold anymore events. It is very discouraging to see young men this lazy. These are young able bodied men who have no desire to help their individual communities or even the Lodges that they belong to. They simply want the ring and free food.
The question we should really be asking here is how do we change the present trend? How do we get our respective grand lodges to realize that these events are hurting us more than they are helping? I know that in my lodge while in the East I will not allow any brother to progress via blue lightning. Further I insist that they learn their obligations, signs etc. While I cannot make it mandatory that they participate in our community activities, I can make it clear that I will not schedule their next degree until they demonstrate a true commitment to the values of the craft. However, I am only one man in one lodge.
Does anyone else have any ideas on this subject?
Fraternally,
David Lanier WM Evans 524